2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11332-020-00644-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cardiopulmonary exercise testing performed with blood flow restriction vs. a traditional maximum test on execution speed, ventilatory thresholds and maximum oxygen uptake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these pilot data are needed before the method can be safely applied to cardiac patients. Relative to no-KAATSU, exercise intensity at VT in KAATSU was ~13% lower in a previous study [30] and ~33% lower current study. These data suggest that KAATSU substantially reduces the mechanical load needed to reach VT.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…However, these pilot data are needed before the method can be safely applied to cardiac patients. Relative to no-KAATSU, exercise intensity at VT in KAATSU was ~13% lower in a previous study [30] and ~33% lower current study. These data suggest that KAATSU substantially reduces the mechanical load needed to reach VT.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Exercise spirometry is a new technology for assessing physical fitness that uses cardiac electrocardiography (CPET) to measure exercise capacity and assess the risk of heart problems [1]. CPET is a non-invasive technique that measures a person's body's response to physical activity by measuring oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production during exercise [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%