2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Cardiovascular Responses Between Upright and Recumbent Cycle Ergometers in Healthy Young Volunteers Performing Low-Intensity Exercise: Assessment of Reliability of the Oxygen Uptake Calculated by Using the ACSM Metabolic Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At matched power output, submaximal ergometry was more efficient in the SS-0° position compared with upright, whereby metabolic state (V̇O 2 , V̇CO 2 , V̇E, RER) and myocardial work (HR, RPP) reduced, while cycling efficiencies (GE and NE) increased. As a comparison with the same external power output (70W), our observations conflict with other work that has observed no difference in HR, RPP and V̇O 2 between upright and recumbent cycling (70°) (Saitoh et al 2005). The authors speculated an insufficient venous return to induce physiological differences between positions, whereas the lower incline angle (~23°) used in this study could hold some accountability for reduced myocardial work and superior efficiency during low-moderate intensity exercise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At matched power output, submaximal ergometry was more efficient in the SS-0° position compared with upright, whereby metabolic state (V̇O 2 , V̇CO 2 , V̇E, RER) and myocardial work (HR, RPP) reduced, while cycling efficiencies (GE and NE) increased. As a comparison with the same external power output (70W), our observations conflict with other work that has observed no difference in HR, RPP and V̇O 2 between upright and recumbent cycling (70°) (Saitoh et al 2005). The authors speculated an insufficient venous return to induce physiological differences between positions, whereas the lower incline angle (~23°) used in this study could hold some accountability for reduced myocardial work and superior efficiency during low-moderate intensity exercise.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The authors speculated an insufficient venous return to induce physiological differences between positions, whereas the lower incline angle (~23°) used in this study could hold some accountability for reduced myocardial work and superior efficiency during low-moderate intensity exercise. Moreover, the back support during ergometery in SS-0° could have contributed to enhanced cycling efficiency with localisation of muscular work to the lower extremities, in contrast to the additions of upper extremity and trunk activation with upright cycling (Saitoh et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While upright cycling is most typically prescribed for these patients, we recently reported that recumbent cycle ergometry in healthy young men acutely increased prefrontal cortex oxygenation by a greater magnitude (Faulkner, Lambrick, Kaufmann, & Stoner, ). This may be because recumbent exercise enhances cardiac output (Quinn, Smith, Vroman, Kertzer, & Olney, ; Saitoh et al, ; Walsh‐Riddle & Blumenthal, ), and cardiac output has been shown to have a linear relationship with cerebral blood flow (Ogoh & Ainslie, ). Contrary to the hypothesis, executive function was found to improve by a similar amount for both upright and recumbent exercise; however, there may be a ceiling effect in healthy young men who would not be expected to have impaired executive function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the arm ergometer, there are no data regarding the ventilatory efficiency in alternative exercise devices for a comparison of results. Most studies on alternative devices focused more on the peak cardiopulmonary values [ 53 , 54 ] or submaximal values of V′O 2 or heart rate [ 55 57 ]. Since ventilatory efficiency data could provide additional information regarding the severity and prognosis of some heart or lung diseases [ 20 23 ], more study of these parameters on the alternative exercise testing devices should be done.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%