2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of catheter ablation and medical therapy for atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0
8

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on LA and LV reverse remodeling and prognosis [ 27 ] has not been established in our study but might deserve specific analysis in this particular population of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on LA and LV reverse remodeling and prognosis [ 27 ] has not been established in our study but might deserve specific analysis in this particular population of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous random clinical trials and meta-analyses have investigated the initial choice of radiofrequency ablation or drug therapy for newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation with an average age above 60 years [ 2 , 3 ]. Results of these studies showed that radiofrequency ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy, for not only reducing all-cause rehospitalization but also improving the long-term quality of life for patients [ 19 ]. Our study focused on outcomes of RFCA in AF patients younger than 45 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis revealed that electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic drugs had similar all-cause mortality compared with medical rate therapy 15. On the other hand, meta-analysis showed that catheter ablation was superior to pharmacological rate and rhythm therapy in all-cause mortality and improvements in quality of life 16. However, due to the small sample size of these randomised trials, current guidelines only suggest catheter ablation with moderate (Class IIa, level B) recommendations 1 2 17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%