1996
DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199602000-00024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Cerebral Blood Flow Measured by Laser- Doppler Flowmetry and Hydrogen Clearance in Cats after Cerebral Insult and Hypervolemic Hemodilution

Abstract: Laser-Doppler flowmetry provides a continuous measurement of blood flow without violating the natural state of circulation. The linearity of the laser-Doppler and hydrogen clearance methods of blood flow measurement were compared using a protocol that produced changes in cerebral blood flow that might be experienced in a neurosurgical setting. Cerebral blood flow was measured in both hemispheres of 12 adult cats during the snaring of one common carotid artery, the intracisternal injection of 5 mg of 5-hydroxyt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47 We did not evaluate the hydrogen clearance technique with regard to premature reper-fusion, but we expect a lower sensitivity because of its limited temporal resolution compared with LDF. 5,46,48,49 …”
Section: Premature Reperfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 We did not evaluate the hydrogen clearance technique with regard to premature reper-fusion, but we expect a lower sensitivity because of its limited temporal resolution compared with LDF. 5,46,48,49 …”
Section: Premature Reperfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, LDF did not record absolute blood flow, and it was very sensitive to an altered position of the LDF probe. In addition, under conditions of changed blood hematocrit or fluctuations of blood gases, LDF did not accurately measure CBF values (Kramer et al, 1996;Gu et al, 2003). Therefore, physiology parameters should be monitored at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many kinds of methods are widely used for measuring CBF. All methods have strengths and weaknesses (Kramer et al, 1996). Compared with other methods, LDF provides a noninvasive and continuous measure of local CBF, increasing the ability to observe instantaneous changes in cerebral microcirculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, many investigators have demonstrated a good correlation in the percent changes in blood flow values between LD flowmetry and other methods such as HC [2, 3, 11, 12, 13], the microsphere technique [14]and [ 14 C]IAP [15]. Skarphedinsson et al [3]reported that the CBF in the parietal cortex using HC was 158.6 ± 11.5 (fast CBF), 29.1 ± 1.6 (slow CBF) and 83.3 ± 7.4 (mean CBF).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in blood flow detected by LD flowmetry have been compared with other measurements performed by the hydrogen clearance (HC) method [2, 3], microspheres [4]and autoradiography [5]. These reports suggested that LD flowmetry does not provide accurate measurements of absolute lCBF values, but it facilitates accurate measurement of changes in lCBF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%