2022
DOI: 10.1080/0972060x.2022.2110388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity ofSalvia fruticosaMill. andS. aramiensisRech. Fill. (Lamiaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…thomasii oils were eucalyptol (26) (40.2 to 60.9%), camphor (41) (1.9 to 14.9%), and α-pinene (10) (3.6 to 5%). Those data confirm the ones available in literature on the genus Salvia, which show eucalyptol to be usually the most abundant compound [21,22]. Like for S. cuneifolia, none of the phytochemicals positively correlated to the biological activities were found as abundant in the two oils, and that could explain the limited phytotoxic effects of those oils.…”
Section: Pearsosupporting
confidence: 88%
“…thomasii oils were eucalyptol (26) (40.2 to 60.9%), camphor (41) (1.9 to 14.9%), and α-pinene (10) (3.6 to 5%). Those data confirm the ones available in literature on the genus Salvia, which show eucalyptol to be usually the most abundant compound [21,22]. Like for S. cuneifolia, none of the phytochemicals positively correlated to the biological activities were found as abundant in the two oils, and that could explain the limited phytotoxic effects of those oils.…”
Section: Pearsosupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These authors reported an antibacterial activity against S. aureus (MIC = 2.5 mg/mL). Another study showed that Salvia fruticose essential oil containing eucalyptol (29.04%) and camphor (21.32%) as major compounds has an efficient antibacterial activity against S. aureus , B. subtilis , and E. coli , and stipulated MIC values ranging from 56.2 to 146 μg/mL for all pathogens [ 49 ]. The mathematical regression model for expressing the response is mentioned as follows: MIC of S. aureus (µg/mL) = 168.4 × A + 195.9 × B + 161 × C − 591.5 × AB − 373.3 × AC − 402.2 × BC − 92.1 × ABC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%