2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of chevron and suspended-zipper braced steel frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gioncu and Mazzolani (2014) indicated the most universal typology of lateral excitation resistant steel frame for concentrically braced frames and the compression diagonal in X-bracing is typically to be neglected among the weak points in the design [7]. A high elastic stiffness and strength are the characteristics which in the chevron braces [13]. Chevron also effectively in the architectural functionality.…”
Section: Diagonal Braced Frames (Dbf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Gioncu and Mazzolani (2014) indicated the most universal typology of lateral excitation resistant steel frame for concentrically braced frames and the compression diagonal in X-bracing is typically to be neglected among the weak points in the design [7]. A high elastic stiffness and strength are the characteristics which in the chevron braces [13]. Chevron also effectively in the architectural functionality.…”
Section: Diagonal Braced Frames (Dbf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the tension braces remain in tension while the braces in compression lost all the axial load capacity after buckling. This contributes to the unbalanced distributed lateral load and caused large bending moment in the intersection of beam and braces [13]. This leads the mid span beam undergoes the plastic hinge and collapse due to unable to sustain the downward forces [10].…”
Section: Chevron Braced Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations