Comparison of Chinese and Indian consumers' evaluative criteria when selecting denim jeans

Abstract

PurposeUS apparel firms have been relatively slow exploring Chinese and Indian apparel markets, despite the countries' tremendous growth potentials. To help US apparel firms successfully enter these promising markets, this study aims to compare evaluative attributes that Chinese and Indian consumers utilize when purchasing denim jeans.Design/methodology/approachData were collected in Shanghai, China and Bangalore, India.FindingsThe results of the study confirmed that Chinese and Indian consumers ranked attributes differently. Chinese consumers placed the highest importance on price, followed by fitting, brand country of origin, quality, and design, whereas Indian consumers placed importance on fitting, brand country of origin, design, price, and quality, in descending order.Research limitations/implicationsCaution needs to be exercised in generalizing the findings since the data for this study were collected from one city in each country. The study tested the idea that the importance of attributes would be different between Chinese and Indian consumers as their cultures and retail development stages differ. This idea was supported in conjoint analysis.Practical implicationsThe findings indicate that a regional approach, assuming that all Asian markets are the same, is inappropriate. Thus, US apparel firms need to pay careful attention to differences in each Asian market.Originality/valueChina and India have been compared frequently in various ways: growth potential, market size, and population. Surprisingly, however, no study has attempted to compare Chinese and Indian consumers' evaluative criteria for apparel products. This is the first empirical study to show the differences between Chinese and Indian consumers in evaluating apparel products.

Product Attributes' Effects on Perceived Values and Repurchase Intention in Korea, USA, and France

“…Several cross-cultural studies (Dawar and Parker, 1994;Moon, Chadee, and Tikoo, 2008;Noh and Seo, 2009) have suggested that product attributes may influence consumers' purchase intentions differently depending on consumers' nationality and other characteristics such as culture and lifestyle (Shawn, 1994;Wee, 1999;Chen-Yu, Hong, & Seock, 2010;Jin, Park, & Ryu, 2009). Hsu and Burns (2002) find that American female college students consider comfort, size and fit and quality to be more important in determining whether to purchase clothing than Taiwanese female college students.…”

They are not all same: variations in Asian consumers’ value perceptions of luxury brands

“…For luxury brands, high price and excellent quality go together as inherent traits (Shukla 2012). Prior studies have observed that functional value, and especially price-quality perceptions, plays a significant role in value formation for inconspicuous products for the Chinese (Jin et al 2010), and for luxury goods amongst Indian (Shukla 2012) and Indonesian consumers (Rao 2005 A survey of actual luxury consumers was used to test the hypotheses. First, a questionnaire was developed based on existing scales.…”

Consumer perspectives of cultural branding: The case of Burberry in Taiwan

“…For instance, Christodoulides et al (2009) concluded that Taiwanese consumers are less likely to consume a luxury brand owing to its perceived uniqueness or ability to shape self-concept, because Taiwan as a society stresses collectivism and avoids uncertainty. By reviewing their fi ndings with Jin et al (2010) , Lu (2008) and Yau ' s (1988) research on Chinese consumers, Hofstede's (1998Hofstede's ( , 2001 cultural dimensions are useful in this study ' s context.…”