2011
DOI: 10.1364/ao.50.005770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of chlorophyll a concentration detected by remote sensors and other chlorophyll indices in inhomogeneous turbid waters

Abstract: A new analytical approach for retrieval of the vertically weighted chlorophyll a concentration (Chl(rs)) detected by remote sensors is presented. Model calculations were carried out for the turbid waters of Lake Kinneret, Israel, and showed that Chl(rs) may be replaced by the average chlorophyll a concentration (Chl(p)) within the upper "penetration layer" 0-Z(p). The study also showed a high correlation between Chl Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the portion of water-leaving radiance backscattered from individual layers decreases with depth, unless a turbid layer is covered by clearer water. Appropriate weighting can be applied to reference profile measurements if vertically resolved attenuation measurements are available (Odermatt et al, 2012a;Sokoletsky and Yacobi, 2011). Due to the lack of such measurements, we average the reference profile measurements taken at 0-5 m as in earlier studies with comparable reference data (Odermatt et al, 2010).…”
Section: Calibration Of Remotely Sensed Chl and Reference Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the portion of water-leaving radiance backscattered from individual layers decreases with depth, unless a turbid layer is covered by clearer water. Appropriate weighting can be applied to reference profile measurements if vertically resolved attenuation measurements are available (Odermatt et al, 2012a;Sokoletsky and Yacobi, 2011). Due to the lack of such measurements, we average the reference profile measurements taken at 0-5 m as in earlier studies with comparable reference data (Odermatt et al, 2010).…”
Section: Calibration Of Remotely Sensed Chl and Reference Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Fr(z 1 , z 2 ) is the fraction of r rs (λ, 0 − ) at the layer between z 1 m and z 2 m, g x (z) is the average weighting function. Three weighting average functions, namely, g GC [8], g Z [10], and g S [9], are as follows:…”
Section: Contribution Of Each Layer To R Rs (0 − λ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between b b (z)/(a(z) + b b (z)) in each water depth and r rs (0 − ) could explain the effects of vertical distribution of phytoplankton on underwater light field. Several approaches have been proposed to reduce the effects of vertical distribution of phytoplankton on R rs (λ) [9,10,17]. The R rs (λ) of stratified Case I waters was interpreted and found to be identical to that of hypothetical homogeneous waters with phytoplankton pigment concentration (C rs ), which is a depth-weighted average of the actual profiles of pigment concentration [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This hypothesis was accepted and used widely in research on vertically nonuniform waters (Mill an-N uñez et al 1997;Zaneveld et al 2005;Bresciani et al 2014). However, a common view concerning a reliable model for weighted mean pigment concentration detectable by remote sensors has not yet been achieved even for Case 1 waters (Sokoletsky and Yacobi 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%