Comparison of classic and chemometric methods used for phosphate removal from fresh human urine under optimum conditions

Abstract

Human urine constitutes 1% of domestic wastewater and can be used to recover nitrogen and phosphorus when collected separately at source. Sustainable nutrient (nitrogen, phosphate, potassium) cycling requires the recovery of these valuable resources from human urine. As nitrogen and phosphorus are valuable nutrients needed for plant growth, these components of urine are an excellent fertilizer. Phosphorus can be applied in natural fertilizers and in addition the pollution load of wastewater treatment plants is reduced. Different nutrient removal and recovery methods from urine have been studied at lab scale, but none so far has reached technological competence and none has been extended to practical use. The focus of this study was to evaluate electrocoagulation as a process for the removal of phosphate from fresh human urine using iron plate electrodes. The effect of pH and current density on phosphate removal was investigated. While determining the optimum conditions for removal, classical and chemometric methods were compared. Using the central composite design (CCD), optimum conditions were determined with only 13 experiments, and time and labour savings were achieved compared to the classical method. Initial pH values and current density were controlled within the range of pH 5–9 and current density 12-40 mA/cm2. From the obtained results, it was found that optimal initial current density is 40 mA/cm2 for both methods, and optimal pH is 7 for the classical method and 6.24 for CCD, which is the natural pH of human urine. Realization of phosphate removal using optimum conditions discovered with CCD, provides savings on experimental effort, time, chemicals and energy consumption, and will contribute to resource recovery, reduction of wastewater load and sustainable fertilizer production.

Sustainable sanitation- how can we improve sanitation systems in the global south?

“…Chemical precipitation is a commonly reported approach to recover nutrients from urine by the formation of non-soluble phosphate salts. Struvite precipitation is the most concerned phosphorus recovery technology which can also simultaneously recover part of ammonium from urine (Krähenbühl et al, 2016;Zamora et al, 2017;Wei et al, 2018;Zheng et al, 2018;Aguado et al, 2019;Pinatha et al, 2020;Oztekin et al, 2022). The precipitation of struvite-K, an analogue of struvite, can simultaneously recover phosphate and potassium from ammonium-depleted urine (Xu et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2012;Xu K. et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019).…”

Pathogens inactivation in nutrient recovery from urine: A review

“…Chemical precipitation is a commonly reported approach to recover nutrients from urine by the formation of non-soluble phosphate salts. Struvite precipitation is the most concerned phosphorus recovery technology which can also simultaneously recover part of ammonium from urine (Krähenbühl et al, 2016;Zamora et al, 2017;Wei et al, 2018;Zheng et al, 2018;Aguado et al, 2019;Li P. et al, 2019;Pinatha et al, 2020;Oztekin et al, 2022). The precipitation of struvite-K, an analogue of struvite, can simultaneously recover phosphate and potassium from ammonium-depleted urine (Xu et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2012;Xu K. et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019).…”