2019 International Conference on Innovative Computing (ICIC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icic48496.2019.8966691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Classification Models for Early Prediction of Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to visualize the decision tree through a 2-D image to understand the selection of significant features. Various researches also extract significant features for better performance [38,39]. However, it is more beneficial to calculate the importance of each feature to enhance the model's prediction.…”
Section: Feature Selection Through Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to visualize the decision tree through a 2-D image to understand the selection of significant features. Various researches also extract significant features for better performance [38,39]. However, it is more beneficial to calculate the importance of each feature to enhance the model's prediction.…”
Section: Feature Selection Through Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on literature [ 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ] in the biomedical area, a comparison was made between the different models implemented according to evaluation metrics described in this area of knowledge, taking into consideration that the values of these metrics are considered better as closer they are to unit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous years, a lot of similar works has been done using data mining techniques in healthcare sector, the result of this work demonstrate the ability of applied algorithms that confirm the results those reported in [5], as the original creators of the used dataset, obtaining 95% confidence interval for sensitivity, specificity and AUC was (82%, 88%), (84%, 90%) and (0.87, 0.91) respectively (using SVM), also by Alickovic and Subasi [11] who used the Random Forest and Genetic Algorithm, obtaining the highest accuracy of 99.48 to diagnosis of breast cancer. In addition the authors in [12] applied different classification model to find the best biomarker for breast cancer. The result of artificial neural network comparatively better than the KNN algorithms results and get an accuracy of 80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%