2020
DOI: 10.21449/ijate.778864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Classification Performances of Mathematics Achievement at PISA 2012 with the Artificial Neural Network, Decision Trees and Discriminant Analysis

Abstract: This study aims to compare the performances of the artificial neural network, decision trees and discriminant analysis methods to classify student achievement. The study uses multilayer perceptron model to form the artificial neural network model, chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm to apply the decision trees method and linear discriminant analysis. The performance of each method has been investigated in different sample sizes when classifying into different numbered subgroups. The st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the dataset contains sensitive personal information (e.g., patient's diagnosis information and customer's shopping information), mining and analyzing the dataset using Pearson correlation coefficient-based decision trees may create privacy leakage problems, which may threaten the privacy security of users. Based on the Pearson correlation coefficient-based decision tree algorithm, we propose a Pearson correlation coefficient-based differential Occupational Therapy International privacy decision tree algorithm to ensure the effectiveness and usability of the algorithm while satisfying the differential privacy [26].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the dataset contains sensitive personal information (e.g., patient's diagnosis information and customer's shopping information), mining and analyzing the dataset using Pearson correlation coefficient-based decision trees may create privacy leakage problems, which may threaten the privacy security of users. Based on the Pearson correlation coefficient-based decision tree algorithm, we propose a Pearson correlation coefficient-based differential Occupational Therapy International privacy decision tree algorithm to ensure the effectiveness and usability of the algorithm while satisfying the differential privacy [26].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study differs from other studies in the literature on PISA in terms of the EDM methods and variables used [4][5][6][7]. Random Forest [4,7], Discriminant Analysis [8], Decision Tree [5,7,9], Logistic Regression [10], Naïve Bayes [11,12] studies are encountered in the literature. However, no article was found using these methods and the data set mentioned in the article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…As a result of the study, it was stated that the Random Forest algorithm produced more successful results. Toprak and Gelbal [8] compared classification performances of artificial neural networks, decision trees and discriminant analysis at PISA 2012 mathematical literacy score for different sample sizes. They used all student data for analysis with 17 mathematical success related variables.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zijian Chen et al nested an ensemble learning training model on top of the original classical model, but in this study, only three categories of academic performance prediction results were classified, and the prediction accuracy was low [25]. Emre Toprak et al compared artificial neural networks, decision trees and linear discriminant methods, and analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of each method for different data types [26]. Pratya et al combined artificial neural networks, decision tree algorithms and Bayesian algorithms to construct prediction models and validate the models using confusion matrices, accuracy, precision, recall, etc.…”
Section: Prediction Model Of Education Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%