2001
DOI: 10.1080/019021401750193629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Clearance of Particles Inhaled With Bolus and Extremely Slow Inhalation Techniques

Abstract: Ten healthy nonsmokers inhaled 6-microm (aerodynamic diameter) Teflon particles labelled with 111In twice, once with the shallow bolus technique (volumetic lung depth 76+/-20 mL ([+/- SD]) and once with the extremely slow inhalation technique (0.05 L/s). The radioactivity in the lungs was measured at 1 and 24 hours as well as at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after both inhalations. The 24-hour lung retention a percentage of lung deposition was significantly lower for the bolus inhalation, 46%+/-9% (+/- SD) than for the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some studies indicate that there is considerable slow clearance from presumably peripheral bronchi [15][16][17][18][19]. Therefore, it has to be considered that some drug included in the fraction present after 24 h may be deposited within this peripheral, conducting airway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some studies indicate that there is considerable slow clearance from presumably peripheral bronchi [15][16][17][18][19]. Therefore, it has to be considered that some drug included in the fraction present after 24 h may be deposited within this peripheral, conducting airway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the healthy subjects and the CF patients were exposed using the same equipment for particles production procedure and inhalation. Identical inhalation pattern was used and radioactivity was measured in the lung with the same detectors throughout the study in both groups [5,20,21]. The average anthropomorphic and lung function data (mean¡SD) of the healthy subjects are given in table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any particles remaining in the lung after 24 h represent alveolar deposition [1,2]. However, previous studies of healthy subjects using a shallow bolus technique as well as studies using extremely slow inhalation flow (0.05 L?s -1 ) and 6 mm particles, resulting in particles deposited in the small airways, show that a considerable fraction of particles may be retained after 24 h [3][4][5] These studies provide evidence that the rapid clearance phase in the tracheobronchial region is followed by a second, slower clearance phase, though still more rapid than alveolar clearance. This intermediate clearance phase, proposed to represent clearance of particles deposited in the bronchiolar region, has been included in the revised dosimetric model for the human respiratory tract, adopted by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately after inhalation, and 24 h later, radioactivity was measured using two 127651-mm NaI detectors fitted with collimators [21][22][23][24][25][26]. The c-spectra from each detector were acquired separately.…”
Section: Measurement Of Radioactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%