1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80604-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of clinical and compliance characteristics between S and W Ileal reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inverse correlation between pouch capacity and evacuation frequency is also supported by the findings of Heppell et al (1982), who found that pouch capacity was significantly greater in patients who had a good functional result compared to those who had a poor result. Similar results have been reported by Harms et al (1990) who found better functional results after W pouches than after S pouches. However, others have failed to show a correlation between volume and function (Keighley et al 1988a;Everett 1989).…”
Section: Pouch Capacitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This inverse correlation between pouch capacity and evacuation frequency is also supported by the findings of Heppell et al (1982), who found that pouch capacity was significantly greater in patients who had a good functional result compared to those who had a poor result. Similar results have been reported by Harms et al (1990) who found better functional results after W pouches than after S pouches. However, others have failed to show a correlation between volume and function (Keighley et al 1988a;Everett 1989).…”
Section: Pouch Capacitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We have previously demonstrated favorable outcomes using the S-pouch configuration. 22 Though the majority of colorectal surgeons have adopted the J-pouch design, we believe the S-pouch may offer superior compliance properties as well as optimal anastomotic limb reach. For these reasons, we have been careful to preserve our current triple limb technique and thereby, maintaining a similar functional outcome while adding a minimallyinvasive approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1,2,5,6 The appropriate operation to remove a schwannoma is enucleation of the tumour from the nerve without damage to the normal fascicle. 7 In this way, the lesion can be removed without significant loss of nerve function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%