Comparison of clinical complications, angiographic results, and device usage of coronary angioplasty using low- and high-compliance balloons

Desmet, Walter; Scheerder, Ivan K. De; Barrios, Laurentino; Piessens, Jan

doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199705)41:1<5::aid-ccd3>3.0.co;2-c

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1997

2008

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, two prospective trials failed to show a difference between compliant and noncompliant balloons for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. 15,16 Application of the LacriCATH (or SinuCATH, when it was available) system affords a number of advantages for the management of frontal ostium stenosis. First, these devices obviate the need for fluoroscopy as the BC is placed under direct endoscopic visualization, avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure and permitting completion in the office setting.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%