2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of clinical-metabolic monitoring and outcomes and coronary risk status in people with type 2 diabetes from Australia, France and Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cardiovascular risk management programs it is important to evaluate the impact of their interventions over time to achieve optimal primary cardiovascular prevention in patients under the care of the program [26]. There may be variation in the management plans of cardiovascular risk programs even within a given region beyond differences in health budget and system characteristics [27]. The use of statins in the LMIC is low in comparison with the HIC [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cardiovascular risk management programs it is important to evaluate the impact of their interventions over time to achieve optimal primary cardiovascular prevention in patients under the care of the program [26]. There may be variation in the management plans of cardiovascular risk programs even within a given region beyond differences in health budget and system characteristics [27]. The use of statins in the LMIC is low in comparison with the HIC [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collected data have been used by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare to report on several national diabetes indicators. ANDIAB has also been used to compare clinical diabetes outcomes in different countries .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative impact of the development and progression of chronic complications can be effectively prevented by tight control of hyperglycaemia and the associated CVRFs [ 33 - 37 ]. However, the frequent combination of late diagnosis, inappropriate quality of care provided to people with diabetes and uneven access to care and treatment play against the effectiveness and feasibility of secondary prevention [ 12 , 13 , 18 - 20 , 22 , 25 , 38 - 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But if such an increase were feasible, it would not necessarily provide a real solution. In fact, using data from countries with higher health care budgets than Argentina, CENEXA has demonstrated that the quality of care provided was similarly poor in all of them [ 22 ]. These findings thus showed that the size of the health budget is not the main constraint for delivering good quality diabetes care and that there is a need to find more efficient interventions to improve health care quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%