2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.07.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of clinical outcomes and anorectal manometry in patients with congenital anorectal malformations treated with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull through

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
59
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors demonstrated that the functional outcome after laparoscopic ARP was superior to that after PSARP because laparoscopic ARP could avoid injuring the muscle complex and nerves around the puborectal muscles [4][5][6]. However, this muscle and nervepreserving technique not only shows the merit of laparoscopic ARP but also those of open rectoplasty (open ARP).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors demonstrated that the functional outcome after laparoscopic ARP was superior to that after PSARP because laparoscopic ARP could avoid injuring the muscle complex and nerves around the puborectal muscles [4][5][6]. However, this muscle and nervepreserving technique not only shows the merit of laparoscopic ARP but also those of open rectoplasty (open ARP).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of stay was mentioned in only 4 articles, and it was reported as 48 hours [5], varied from 3 to 12 days [22], an average of 6 days [37], and a mean of 14.3 days [41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 85 patients, 35 were evaluated using a subjective score that included parameters such as frequency of defecation, staining, perianal erosion, anal shape, and medication used [28,47]. Twenty-four patients were evaluated by another subjective method (Kelly score), with the authors noting that their patients had a score of 3.8 [16,41]. In 22 cases, the authors used what we considered a clear description of the clinical results: 15 patients had voluntary bowel movements, with 2 of them having minimal, occasional soiling [25,33,46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations