2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of clinical outcomes of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in uterine cervical cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13-10)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
75
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
75
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies [14,15] have shown that FIGO stage, Hb level, and tumor size are significant prognostic factors of cervical cancer and the results of the present study were compatible as shown in Table 1. In addition, treatment modality (CCRT vs. RT) was also reported to be an impact prognostic factor, as CCRT had a higher rate of success than RT alone [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Previous studies [14,15] have shown that FIGO stage, Hb level, and tumor size are significant prognostic factors of cervical cancer and the results of the present study were compatible as shown in Table 1. In addition, treatment modality (CCRT vs. RT) was also reported to be an impact prognostic factor, as CCRT had a higher rate of success than RT alone [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Whereas several studies have demonstrated that patients with ACA have poorer prognosis than those with SCC [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]27,28,32] this study shows no difference in the therapeutic response and death rate at the end of the first course of cancer-directed therapy, which is in accordance with the findings of other studies that indicates similar recurrence rate [33][34] and survival [4,5,35] between both histologic types of cervical cancer. Considering patients with locally advanced and advanced disease, FIGO stage ≥ IIB, radiotherapy alone was the treatment strategy for 43.9% of the ACA patients and 52% of the SCC patients, and an inadequate response was observed in 33.3% and 31.6% of them, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Baek et al (n ¼ 337) observed no differences in patterns of recurrence, time to recurrence, RFS, and OS between AC and ASC [22]. A Korean multicenter retrospective study (total n ¼ 1323; AC/ASC, n ¼ 255) reported that AC histology was associated with poor survival outcomes than SCC, and prognosis of ASC histology was closer to that of SCC histology [23]. Conversely, a meta-analysis reported that ASC may have poorer outcomes compared with AC of the cervix [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%