2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Endodontic Microsurgery: 1 Year versus Long-term Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, Song et al . ). In this study, most of the teeth had a large persistent periapical lesion with a diameter ranging from 6 to 20 mm (72.2%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, Song et al . ). In this study, most of the teeth had a large persistent periapical lesion with a diameter ranging from 6 to 20 mm (72.2%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, , Song et al . , ). This suggested prognosis of AMS is far better than that reported in previous long‐term studies on apical surgery performed without emphasis on microsurgery techniques, in which recurrence of the disease occurs in 5%–25% (Jesslen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The probability of success of modern Endodontic Microsurgery is remarkably high 123. It is the recommended therapy for endodontically treated teeth with unresolved periapical lesions when the prognosis of secondary non-surgical root canal treatment is questionable 45.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this investigation was to evaluate the use of B-G in endodontic therapy and associated microsurgery, and provide clinical findings. Clinical records and radiographic images were collected from patients who had undergone root canal treatment or periradicular surgery in private practice and had a minimum 1-year follow-up, which was deemed sufficient in predicting healing after surgery [5]. As part of the review process, original articles published in English from 1971 (year of B-G being introduced) [4] up to, and including, 21 st August 2016 were considered for the discussion of its advantages in terms of efficacy and efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%