2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02071-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of coated meshes for intraperitoneal placement in animal studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Purpose Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh in hernia repair can result in adhesions leading to intestinal obstruction and fistulation. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the effects of mesh coatings reducing the tissue-to-mesh adhesion in animal studies. Methods Pubmed and Embase were systematically searched. Animal experiments comparing intraperitoneally placed meshes with coatings were eligible for inclusion. Only studies with comparable follow-up, measurements, and species were included fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a great variability as for the polymers that make up the meshes (porosity, weight, pore shape, biomechanical properties, and fixation), and type of implant, models of defects induced in the abdominal wall, types of animal, types of inflammation, and fibroplasia scores intended for assessing the mesh incorporation process 27 , 28 . This implies technical limitations for comparing experimental studies using meshes to repair induced abdominal wall defects 27 , 29 , 30 . Such heterogeneity in the design of studies and the impossibility of carrying them out in full in human beings impose a limitation to the extrapolation of results and conclusions to the clinical scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a great variability as for the polymers that make up the meshes (porosity, weight, pore shape, biomechanical properties, and fixation), and type of implant, models of defects induced in the abdominal wall, types of animal, types of inflammation, and fibroplasia scores intended for assessing the mesh incorporation process 27 , 28 . This implies technical limitations for comparing experimental studies using meshes to repair induced abdominal wall defects 27 , 29 , 30 . Such heterogeneity in the design of studies and the impossibility of carrying them out in full in human beings impose a limitation to the extrapolation of results and conclusions to the clinical scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second type of mesh was a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) multifilament textile without barrier. The PET was used as a positive control for the development of soft tissue visceral attachment [12,15] to the mesh. Tissue attachments was induced , using a caecal abrasion and a peritoneal defect model previously described [12,13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Це, в свою чергу, може покращити віддалені результати хірургічного лікування гриж. Для практичної герніології є надзвичайно важливим завданням адгезивної взаємодії новоутвореної сполучної тканини з матеріалом сіток [18].…”
Section: обговорення результатів дослідженняunclassified