2020
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci14930-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Cold Hardiness Evaluation of Woody Species by ELLT and TTCLT

Abstract: Cold hardiness evaluation is important for screening woody species in cold areas. We compared cold hardiness by estimating the 50% lethal temperature (LT50) using electrolyte leakage test (ELLT50) and triphenyltetrazolium chloride test (TTCLT50) for 26 woody species in the Bashang region of China. One-year-old shoots were collected in January and exposed to five subfreezing temperatures in a programmable temperature and humidity chamber. LT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, as surveyed above, there are a wide variety of heat killing protocols used in electrolyte leakage studies; variability exists in both temperature and intended duration of heat killing, likely hindering generalization of findings. Furthermore, duration of heat killing treatments is often not even obvious: it is unclear whether duration of actual exposure to a target temperature or total time in hot water bath is reported (e.g., “killed in a boiling water bath for 20 min” [ 39 ]) or an autoclave cycle (which usually also includes higher pressure to prevent boiling over). Liquid nitrogen immersion, on the other hand, exposes samples to a physically constrained range of temperatures (− 196 to – 210 ℃) for a much more obvious duration of time (the time of immersion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as surveyed above, there are a wide variety of heat killing protocols used in electrolyte leakage studies; variability exists in both temperature and intended duration of heat killing, likely hindering generalization of findings. Furthermore, duration of heat killing treatments is often not even obvious: it is unclear whether duration of actual exposure to a target temperature or total time in hot water bath is reported (e.g., “killed in a boiling water bath for 20 min” [ 39 ]) or an autoclave cycle (which usually also includes higher pressure to prevent boiling over). Liquid nitrogen immersion, on the other hand, exposes samples to a physically constrained range of temperatures (− 196 to – 210 ℃) for a much more obvious duration of time (the time of immersion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…variability exists in both temperature and intended duration of boiling, likely hindering generalization of findings. Furthermore, duration of boiling treatments is often not even obvious: it is unclear whether duration of actual exposure to a target temperature or total time in hot water bath is reported (e.g., "killed in a boiling water bath for 20 min" [36]) or an autoclave cycle (which usually also includes higher pressure to prevent boiling over). Liquid nitrogen immersion, on the other hand, exposes samples to a physically constrained range of temperatures (-196 to -210℃) for a much more obvious duration of time (the time of immersion).…”
Section: Liquid Nitrogen As a Negative Control Can Enhance The Use Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%