1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(69)80401-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of combustion instabilities found in various types of combustion chambers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A useful distinction between the different types is made in [158] in which the instabilities have been defined as falling into three main classes:…”
Section: Combustion Associated Instability In Pumping Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A useful distinction between the different types is made in [158] in which the instabilities have been defined as falling into three main classes:…”
Section: Combustion Associated Instability In Pumping Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of combustion instabilities and noise are numerous [24,26,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] and started long ago [41] . A ame is not needed to produce such coupling: as shown by Rijke [54,55] , a heated gauze placed in a tube is enough to produce a "singing" tube caused by the coupling between the acoustic modes of the duct and the unsteady heat released by the gauze [56,57] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barreré and Williams [2] classified these instabilities as intrinsic instability, acoustic instability, shock instability, and fluid-dynamic instability. Fluid dynamic instability, which arises due to vortex shedding, usually from a bluff body flameholder, is relevant to the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%