2017
DOI: 10.5336/biostatic.2016-53627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Commonly Used Methods for Testing Interaction Effect in Time-Course Microarray Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More advanced techniques for identifying differential profiles are commonly used in time course gene expression studies. For instance, maSigPro uses a two stage method to filter genes based on their expression profile [ 14 ], BATS uses a Bayesian approach to rank genes of interest [ 15 ], which can offer increased accuracy for time courses with more data points [ 16 ], and the EDGE software can identify time dependent changes [ 17 ]. While these methods can rapidly identify differences between experimental groups their univariate nature provides a specific, rather than comprehensive, view of the data [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More advanced techniques for identifying differential profiles are commonly used in time course gene expression studies. For instance, maSigPro uses a two stage method to filter genes based on their expression profile [ 14 ], BATS uses a Bayesian approach to rank genes of interest [ 15 ], which can offer increased accuracy for time courses with more data points [ 16 ], and the EDGE software can identify time dependent changes [ 17 ]. While these methods can rapidly identify differences between experimental groups their univariate nature provides a specific, rather than comprehensive, view of the data [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%