2019
DOI: 10.1117/1.jatis.5.1.014007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of communication architectures for a fiber-positioning spectrograph

Abstract: The communication architecture required to provide a bidirectional communication between a central command node and a full set of fiber positioners feeding a spectrograph is studied. Six different architectures have been analyzed in terms of communication time and power consumption. These architectures are the result of the combination of three different communication protocols: transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) over ethernet, interintegrated circuit (I 2 C), and controller area network.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reconfiguration timescales with the number of fibers are thus inefficient for next-generation massive spectroscopy surveys (Cui et al 2012). The most efficient devices are the robotic fiber positioner (RFP) arrays because thousands of fibers can be positioned simultaneously (Martinez-Garcia et al 2019) at the cost of numerous actuators (Smith et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reconfiguration timescales with the number of fibers are thus inefficient for next-generation massive spectroscopy surveys (Cui et al 2012). The most efficient devices are the robotic fiber positioner (RFP) arrays because thousands of fibers can be positioned simultaneously (Martinez-Garcia et al 2019) at the cost of numerous actuators (Smith et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%