2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Angiography to Assess Medina Classification in Coronary Bifurcations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with prior studies, we identified the presence of coronary plaque in SB as a robust predictor of its occlusion [2,15,[31][32][33][34]. In our recent paper on CTA-derived RESOLVE score, diameter stenosis of SB before MV stenting and pre-procedural diameter stenosis of bifurcation core achieved the highest diagnostic accuracies for predicting SB occlusion (AUC of 0.720 and 0.725, respectively) [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In line with prior studies, we identified the presence of coronary plaque in SB as a robust predictor of its occlusion [2,15,[31][32][33][34]. In our recent paper on CTA-derived RESOLVE score, diameter stenosis of SB before MV stenting and pre-procedural diameter stenosis of bifurcation core achieved the highest diagnostic accuracies for predicting SB occlusion (AUC of 0.720 and 0.725, respectively) [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In this context, the visual CTA-derived V-RESOLVE score is yet another predictor (after quantitative CTA-derived RESOLVE score, Medina class with any involvement of the proximal MV and SB plaque, and the presence of any plaque within the first 5 mm of SB segment on coronary CTA) of SB occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention. 20,21 Discriminative Performance of CTA-derived V-RESOLVE Score Our data confirmed the ability of CTA-derived V-RESOLVE score to stratify lesions into high-risk group and non-high-risk group of SB occlusion. Specifically, by using the cutoff value of 17 points (defined as the lowest score in quartile 4) for discrimination between high-risk group ( ≥ 17) and non-highrisk group (< 17), the incidence of SB occlusion was significantly higher in the high-risk group (18.6%) than in the non-high-risk group (3.8%).…”
Section: Predictive Accuracy Of Cta-derived V-resolve Scoresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In this regard, our findings compare equally with earlier studies on the ability of the angiography-based V-RESOLVE score to predict SB occlusion during coronary bifurcation intervention (with AUC ranging from 0.75 to 0.80), and further extend the utility of coronary CTA for guiding PCI. In this context, the visual CTA-derived V-RESOLVE score is yet another predictor (after quantitative CTA-derived RESOLVE score, Medina class with any involvement of the proximal MV and SB plaque, and the presence of any plaque within the first 5 mm of SB segment on coronary CTA) of SB occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention 20,21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have compared the anatomical SYNTAX score derived from CCTA and ICA and rea rmed thatits calculation using CCTA is reasonably accurate and reproducible, especially in non-complex patients [5,[18][19][20] , however some discordance between the two has been seen in heavy calci ed plaque and the Medina classi cation of bifurcation lesions [21][22][23] . The present study also showed comparable total anatomical SYNTAX scores between the two modalities, as the tendency for CCTA to overestimate the severity of stenosis-due to the blooming effect of calcium-and the resulting increased number of lesions was tempered by ICA identifying more lesions >20 mm, more trifurcation lesions (due to the lack of the optimal angiographic view)and more severe tortuosity (due to the two-dimensional perception of the tortuosity).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%