1963
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(63)90124-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of continuous long-term heparin and oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with severe angina pectoris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, high doses of heparin provided greater reduction in mortality than oral anticoagulant therapy. 83 Even mini-doses of heparin (5000 to 6000 IU subcutaneously daily) showed a statistically significant advantage over oral anticoagulants, although in this study, the nonrandom allocation of patients could have affected the results. 84 On the other hand, while poorly designed studies supported a beneficial effect of heparin in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, 8587 two wellcontrolled trials did not show that intermittent heparin therapy was better than a placebo 88 or oral anticoagulants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Moreover, high doses of heparin provided greater reduction in mortality than oral anticoagulant therapy. 83 Even mini-doses of heparin (5000 to 6000 IU subcutaneously daily) showed a statistically significant advantage over oral anticoagulants, although in this study, the nonrandom allocation of patients could have affected the results. 84 On the other hand, while poorly designed studies supported a beneficial effect of heparin in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, 8587 two wellcontrolled trials did not show that intermittent heparin therapy was better than a placebo 88 or oral anticoagulants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%