1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1996)19:4<416::aid-lsm6>3.0.co;2-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of continuous versus pulsed CO2 and Nd:YAG laser-induced pulmonary parenchymal lung injury in a rabbit model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased morbidity, particularly delayed pneumothorax, has been reported in patients treated with laser LVRS compared with staple LVRS [1]. Prior laser LVRS studies in animals have demonstrated that significant lung injury occurs in normal rabbit lungs with both CO 2 and Nd:YAG laser exposure, though the clinical and histologic presentations were distinct [8,10,11]. Holmium laser exposure is more efficacious but yields no differences in morbidity compared with Nd:YAG and CO 2 exposures [7].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased morbidity, particularly delayed pneumothorax, has been reported in patients treated with laser LVRS compared with staple LVRS [1]. Prior laser LVRS studies in animals have demonstrated that significant lung injury occurs in normal rabbit lungs with both CO 2 and Nd:YAG laser exposure, though the clinical and histologic presentations were distinct [8,10,11]. Holmium laser exposure is more efficacious but yields no differences in morbidity compared with Nd:YAG and CO 2 exposures [7].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%