2000
DOI: 10.1080/00994480.2000.10748316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Control Options in Private Offices in an Advanced Lighting Controls Testbed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant savings were found for all space types (see Table 15), and they were consistent with the ranges of savings found in previous studies of the energy impacts of lighting control using occupancy sensors [e.g., Floyd, et al 1995, Rundquist 1996, Jennings et al 1999Maniccia et al 1999;Seattle City Light 1992, Richman et al (1996]. The results demonstrate that both the specific room use and the delay time associated with switching lights off significantly impact the magnitude of the savings.…”
Section: A-3: Lighting Savings Estimation and Lighting Schedulessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Significant savings were found for all space types (see Table 15), and they were consistent with the ranges of savings found in previous studies of the energy impacts of lighting control using occupancy sensors [e.g., Floyd, et al 1995, Rundquist 1996, Jennings et al 1999Maniccia et al 1999;Seattle City Light 1992, Richman et al (1996]. The results demonstrate that both the specific room use and the delay time associated with switching lights off significantly impact the magnitude of the savings.…”
Section: A-3: Lighting Savings Estimation and Lighting Schedulessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…There is a fair amount of work regarding the influence of user control (vs. automated systems) in office lighting, mainly aiming for a balance between reduced energy consumption and user comfort. Findings suggest that automated systems have the potential to reduce energy consumption [19]. Nevertheless, allowing a user to have control over its lighting has a positive effect on user comfort [20] and may still result in reduced energy consumption, compared to automated systems aiming for legislation standards [21].…”
Section: Relation User and System Control Of Lightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others estimate average energy savings of about 30% 42 . There is a growing literature that addresses the effectiveness of occupancy sensors for controlling office ambient lighting systems, and other studies have evaluated the effectiveness of occupancy-based switching for power management of office equipment [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] . There are often significant differences between observed savings and industry estimated savings that result from the application of these systems.…”
Section: Performance Of Current Occupancy-based Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jennings et al studied the energy savings from various lighting control options, including occupancy sensing, light level adjustment, manual dimming, and daylighting, and concluded 20-26% of energy savings could be achieved by occupancy sensing with a 15 to 20-minute time delay 49 . Energy use was monitored for seven months in 99 private offices in a 21-story office building in California, and particularly, energy savings by occupancy sensing was calculated in 35 offices equipped with a manual switch and occupancy sensor.…”
Section: Performance Of Current Occupancy-based Control Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation