2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of control strategies for hysteresis attenuation in electromechanical actuators subject to dispersion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decoupling identification approach for the proposed model consists of the following two steps, as summarized in Figure 14. First step: Identification of the linear dynamic model (8). In order to capture the high-frequency content of the FPDS, the generation period of the PRBS signal is set to 1 ms.…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decoupling identification approach for the proposed model consists of the following two steps, as summarized in Figure 14. First step: Identification of the linear dynamic model (8). In order to capture the high-frequency content of the FPDS, the generation period of the PRBS signal is set to 1 ms.…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several compensation algorithms have been explored to mitigate the hysteresis phenomenon of an FPDS, which can be categorized into two primary groups: hysteresis model-free and hysteresis model-based approaches [8]. Concerning the hysteresis modelfree strategy, the hysteresis is regarded as a bounded disturbance to the nominal system [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%