2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of conventional, amplification and bio-assay detection methods for a chronic wasting disease inoculum pool

Abstract: Longitudinal studies of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in the native host have provided considerable understanding of how this prion disease continues to efficiently spread among cervid species. These studies entail great cost in animal, time and financial support. A variety of methods have emerged including transgenic mouse bioassay, western blot, enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA), immunohistochemistry (IHC), serial protein misfolding cyclic amplification (sPMCA) and real time quaking-induced conversion (RT-Qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CWD-positive brain homogenate inoculum used in these studies was created by pooling sections of brain from six deer with terminal CWD infection [ 33 ]. This cervid brain pool 6 (CBP6) contained 3.33 × 10 6 50% lethal doses/g as determined by intracranial titration in cervid PrP transgenic mice (Tg(cerPrP)5037) [ 32 , 33 , 41 ]. The CWD-negative brain inoculum was confirmed negative by western blot, RT-QuIC, and mouse bioassay [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CWD-positive brain homogenate inoculum used in these studies was created by pooling sections of brain from six deer with terminal CWD infection [ 33 ]. This cervid brain pool 6 (CBP6) contained 3.33 × 10 6 50% lethal doses/g as determined by intracranial titration in cervid PrP transgenic mice (Tg(cerPrP)5037) [ 32 , 33 , 41 ]. The CWD-negative brain inoculum was confirmed negative by western blot, RT-QuIC, and mouse bioassay [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have indicated that the concentration of infectious prions in saliva is near the endpoint of a CWD-positive brain homogenate titrated in cervid PrP-expressing transgenic mice; i.e. 10 −6 [ 32 , 33 ]. One hypothesis that may explain such low dose infectivity would be that prions in saliva are inherently more infectious by mucosal exposure routes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, classic diagnostic methods, IHC, ELISA, and WB, failed to detect prion deposition at low concentrations, such as the expected amounts during the early phase of prion replication. By contrast, PMCA and RT‐QuIC successfully detected prion presence even at very low concentrations, undetectable by traditional methods (McNulty et al ., ). Thus, considering their insufficient sensitivity for diagnosis in acute phases, IHC, ELISA, and WB should not be used alone for early, asymptomatic CWD surveillance.…”
Section: Cwd Detectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A comparison of CWD detection methods found that all diagnostic methods (IHC, ELISA, WB, PMCA, and RT-QuIC) can successfully detect CWD infection post-mortem in advanced, terminal phases (McNulty et al, 2019). However, classic diagnostic methods, IHC, ELISA, and WB, failed to detect prion deposition at low concentrations, such as the expected amounts during the early phase of prion replication.…”
Section: Cwd Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeded amplification assays such as PMCA and RT-QuIC can reliably and specifically detect prion seeding activity that is several orders of magnitude more sensitive than an animal bioassay (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55). The relationship between prion infectivity in animals and in vitro seeding activity is only beginning to be understood (56). Detection of prions in blood with PMCA and RT-QuIC from hosts in the preclinical phase of disease before the reliable detection of infectivity in experimental and naturally occurring prion disease is well documented (19)(20)(21)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62) and raises the possibility that this in vitro seeding activity represents bona fide infectious prion particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%