2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icssbe.2012.6396619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of conventional measures of skewness and kurtosis for small sample size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 below provides the results of the procedures undertaken to validate the model. The skewness and kurtosis ranged between −1.2 to 1.2, indicating that data is normally distributed [141,142]. The relationship between the variables exhibited a linear distribution pattern indicating linearity and homoscedasticity.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Table 1 below provides the results of the procedures undertaken to validate the model. The skewness and kurtosis ranged between −1.2 to 1.2, indicating that data is normally distributed [141,142]. The relationship between the variables exhibited a linear distribution pattern indicating linearity and homoscedasticity.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Skewness and Excess Kurtosis (abbreviated “Kurtosis”) are measures of the distribution’s asymmetry and tailing with respect to a normally distributed population [ 45 , 46 ]. Skewness and kurtosis values of zero indicate perfectly normally distributed observed data.…”
Section: Results and Discussion–physical And Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the power study and error analysis of the KW test considering sample sizes and data distribution notify the test's limitations [9,10]. Power plots were also computed for SW and KS tests and are analyzed for various data distributions to study tests' behavior against nonnormal distributions [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%