2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42344-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in congenital diaphragmatic hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hee-Beom Yang,
Agostino Pierro,
Hyun-Young Kim

Abstract: Outcomes of conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) were compared through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcome measures included mortality and incidence of chronic lung disease (CLD). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the strategy for applying HFOV in CDH patients. Group A: CMV was initially applied in all CDH patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In management of CDH carefully instituted perinatal care plans are critically required especially for the respiratory system, monitoring of pulmonary hypertension and dealing with cardiac dysfunction. Permissive hypercapnia or 'gentle ventilation' has signi cantly contributed to marked improvements in survival for CDH [17]. The VICI trial found no differences in lung volume recruitment and / or outcome(s) of fatality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia comparing CDH patients who received conventional ventilation vs HOFV [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In management of CDH carefully instituted perinatal care plans are critically required especially for the respiratory system, monitoring of pulmonary hypertension and dealing with cardiac dysfunction. Permissive hypercapnia or 'gentle ventilation' has signi cantly contributed to marked improvements in survival for CDH [17]. The VICI trial found no differences in lung volume recruitment and / or outcome(s) of fatality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia comparing CDH patients who received conventional ventilation vs HOFV [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%