2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20160316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of conventional risk factors, clinical and angiographic profile between younger and older coronary heart disease patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An Indian study showed SVD in 57.1% of the patients followed by DVD in 11.5% and TVD in 7.1% cases [26]. Khadkikar GD, et al found SVD, DVD, TVD and no vessel disease among 50%, 13.6%, 4.5% and 31.8% patients respectively [27]. Colkesen AY, et al in their study on CAD in young adults also found LAD was the most commonly involved vessel, followed by RCA, LCX, and LMCA [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An Indian study showed SVD in 57.1% of the patients followed by DVD in 11.5% and TVD in 7.1% cases [26]. Khadkikar GD, et al found SVD, DVD, TVD and no vessel disease among 50%, 13.6%, 4.5% and 31.8% patients respectively [27]. Colkesen AY, et al in their study on CAD in young adults also found LAD was the most commonly involved vessel, followed by RCA, LCX, and LMCA [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Khadkikar GD et al, observed SVD, DVD, TVD and no vessel disease in 50%, 13.6%, 4.5% and 31.8% of cases [19] respectively.…”
Section: Analysis Of Angiographic Findingsmentioning
confidence: 96%