2004
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of conventional tube test technique and gel microcolumn assay for direct antiglobulin test: A large study

Abstract: Gel microcolumn assay (GMA) is a modified serological technique that has been used for ABO and Rh typing, direct antiglobulin test (DAT), detecting alloantibodies, red cell phenotyping, and other applications. However, for DAT, the role of GMA is controversial. The purpose of this large study was to compare the performance of the conventional tube test (CTT) to GMA for detecting potentially significant antibodies coating red blood cells in vivo. From January 1996 to May 2002, we performed DATs by GMA and CTT o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
25
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was carried out to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, suitability and adaptability of Grifols DG Gel ® cards (an 8‐column microtube agglutination‐based system new to the UK) to the daily blood transfusion laboratory routine. Grifols DG Gel ® cards were compared with the reference method of five laboratories in the United Kingdom (DiaMed‐ID ® cards, a system with a well known performance reliability) (Bromilow et al , 1991; Weisbach et al , 1999; Grey et al , 2002; Novaretti et al , 2003, 2004; Paz et al , 2004; Cid et al , 2006; Schoenfeld et al , 2009) in almost all cases, and with the conventional tube technique in some newborn tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was carried out to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, suitability and adaptability of Grifols DG Gel ® cards (an 8‐column microtube agglutination‐based system new to the UK) to the daily blood transfusion laboratory routine. Grifols DG Gel ® cards were compared with the reference method of five laboratories in the United Kingdom (DiaMed‐ID ® cards, a system with a well known performance reliability) (Bromilow et al , 1991; Weisbach et al , 1999; Grey et al , 2002; Novaretti et al , 2003, 2004; Paz et al , 2004; Cid et al , 2006; Schoenfeld et al , 2009) in almost all cases, and with the conventional tube technique in some newborn tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Dal antigen investigators utilized a gel technology in conjunction with a standard tube technology for crossmatching and reported agreement of both methods 11 . In human medicine the gel test is comparable to the tube assay for both the indirect and direct antiglobulin tests 23–26 . There are currently 2 commercially available gel tests for canine and feline crossmatching: one manufactured by DiaMed and one manufactured by DMS Laboratories e,f (Figure 4).…”
Section: Crossmatching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More comprehensive testing should be performed when the tube agglutination DAT is negative in a patient with suspected immune-mediated hemolytic anemia. Further comparisons may be required to determine the proficiency of flow cytometric assays [17,18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%