Endothelial keratoplasty is now favored over full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty for corneal decompensation secondary to endothelial dysfunction. Although endothelial keratoplasty has evolved as surgeons strive to improve outcomes, fewer patients than expected achieve best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 despite healthy grafts and no ocular comorbidities. Reasons for this remain unclear, with theories including anterior stromal changes, differences in graft thickness and regularity, induced high order aberrations, and the nature of the graft-host interface. Newer iterations of endothelial keratoplasty such as thin manual DSEK, ultrathin DSAEK, and DMEK have achieved rates of 20/20 acuity of approximately 50%, comparable to modern cataract surgery , and it may be that a ceiling exists, particularly in the older age group of patients. Establishing the relative contribution of the factors that determine visual quality following endothelial keratoplasty will help drive further innovation, optimising visual and patient-reported outcomes while improving surgical efficacy and safety.