2022
DOI: 10.1021/jasms.2c00153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Cosine, Modified Cosine, and Neutral Loss Based Spectrum Alignment For Discovery of Structurally Related Molecules

Abstract: Spectrum alignment of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data using the modified cosine similarity and subsequent visualization as molecular networks have been demonstrated to be a useful strategy to discover analogs of molecules from untargeted MS/MS-based metabolomics experiments. Recently, a neutral loss matching approach has been introduced as an alternative to MS/MS-based molecular networking with an implied performance advantage in finding analogs that cannot be discovered using existing MS/MS spectrum ali… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similarity between any two EI full scan mass spectra can be measured using a variety of techniques [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]; one long-standing approach for approximating similarity is referred to as the dot-product, or cosine similarity. We denote the cosine similarity between mass spectra 𝑥 and 𝑦, measured with a low-resolution mass spectrometer and m/z tolerance 𝜖 #$ = 0, as 𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝜖 #$ ), and approximate the dissimilarity between any mass spectra as 𝜙 " (𝑥, 𝑦, 𝜖 #$ ) = 1 − 𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝜖 #$ ).…”
Section: Calculating Dissimilarity Between Measurements and Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity between any two EI full scan mass spectra can be measured using a variety of techniques [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]; one long-standing approach for approximating similarity is referred to as the dot-product, or cosine similarity. We denote the cosine similarity between mass spectra 𝑥 and 𝑦, measured with a low-resolution mass spectrometer and m/z tolerance 𝜖 #$ = 0, as 𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝜖 #$ ), and approximate the dissimilarity between any mass spectra as 𝜙 " (𝑥, 𝑦, 𝜖 #$ ) = 1 − 𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝜖 #$ ).…”
Section: Calculating Dissimilarity Between Measurements and Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the main metabolites detected in the ethanolic extract (SREE), fractions SREFr2, were putatively annotated as flavonoid derivatives, and they are illustrated in Figure 2A. Thus, modified cosine [35] was applied to assess the MS/MS correspondence between experimental spectra and reference spectra available in GNPS libraries [18]. For instance, 5,7-Dihydroxy-8-C-geranylflavanone (Figure 2B3) showed a fragment of m/z 165 that could be generated by heterocyclic ring fission (HRF) [36] in the C-ring of the precursor ion, and pongaflavone (Figure 2B2) showed loss of CH2O (30 Da) from the pyrano.…”
Section: Bioactive Molecular Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the last two decades have brought an explosion of new trends in natural products discovery such as liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) associated with machine learning-based tools, for instance, MolNetEnhancer [18] and ClassyFire [19], as well as MS-open databases, such as GNPS [20], have provided comprehensive support for the study of natural products. With the availability of reference spectra open databases, obtaining putative structures has become easier than a decade ago, with a high level of con dence in metabolite identi cation [21]. In addition, in silico methods have been developed to connect mass spectrometry data and in vitro bioactivity data of extracts and fractions, allowing for the in silico prediction of potential bioactivity for a single or group of metabolites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%