2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000114819.37569.4b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Cox and Gray’s survival models in severe sepsis*

Abstract: We confirm that many of the important predictors of mortality in severe sepsis are nonproportional and find that Gray's model seems best suited for modeling survival in this condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We examined time to mortality censored at 1 year between the three FB groups using Kaplan Meier failure plots and compared using Log-rank test. We fitted Gray’s model (20) (supplement S5) to estimate risk-adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for association between positive or negative FB, compared with even FB (reference category), and time to mortality censored at 1 year using five time nodes and six intervals, since Cox models failed proportionality assumptions for several covariates. We also fitted multivariable logistic regression and estimated risk-adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for mortality and renal recovery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We examined time to mortality censored at 1 year between the three FB groups using Kaplan Meier failure plots and compared using Log-rank test. We fitted Gray’s model (20) (supplement S5) to estimate risk-adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for association between positive or negative FB, compared with even FB (reference category), and time to mortality censored at 1 year using five time nodes and six intervals, since Cox models failed proportionality assumptions for several covariates. We also fitted multivariable logistic regression and estimated risk-adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for mortality and renal recovery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… $ Shown are adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) estimated from Gray’s model (20) for association between FB and mortality for each time interval. Models for all subjects, non-RRT, and non-AKI subgroups included six time intervals and five time nodes.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with subjects with normal vital signs at hospital discharge, the 225 (13%) subjects with abnormal vital signs had higher IL-6 concentrations (10.5 vs. 6.5 pg/ml, P , 0.001), but no differences in IL-10 concentrations were seen between the * Ranges of hazards ratios are reported for 10 time points over 1 year using the Gray's model (20).…”
Section: Cytokine Concentrations and All-cause Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum likelihood estimation is used to obtain estimates of the regression coefficients. We used a Gray's survival model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for circulating cytokine concentrations and death over 1 year because the hazards failed Cox's proportionality assumption (20). The Gray's model estimates HRs over 10 intervals (with 11 time nodes) and thus provides a detailed description of the change in HRs over 1 year.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It makes entire sense that wider genetic screens might be more predictive than early physiology in teasing late death. Different classes of predicative models are required to tease out time-varying hazard ratios [53]. Such a study would be a natural extension of this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%