Comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma -a Meta-Analysis of comparative study

Abstract

Background: Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) necessitates urgent surgical intervention. Craniotomy (CO) and decompressive craniectomy (DC) are the two main surgical procedures for ASDH evacuation. This meta-analysis is to compare the clinical outcomes between the CO and DC procedures. Materials and methods: The authors performed a meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C513, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C514) Statement protocol and assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews (AMSTAR) (Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C515) guideline. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Comparative studies reporting the outcomes of the CO and DC procedures in patients with ASDH were included. Results: A total of 15 articles with 4853 patients [2531 (52.2%) receiving CO and 2322 (47.8%) receiving DC] were included in this meta-analysis. DC was associated with higher mortality [31.5 vs. 40.6%, odds ratio (OR)=0.58, 95% CI: 0.43–0.77] and rate of patients with poorer neurological outcomes (54.3 vs. 72.7%; OR=0.43, 95% CI: 0.28–0.67) compared to CO. The meta-regression model identified the comparability of preoperative severity as the only potential source of heterogeneity. When the preoperative severity was comparable between the two procedures, the mortality (CO 35.5 vs. DC 38.1%, OR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.62–1.02) and the proportion of patients with poorer neurological outcomes (CO 64.8 vs. DC 66.0%; OR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.57–1.16) were both similar. Reoperation rates were similar between the two procedures (CO 16.1 vs. DC 16.0%; OR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.61–1.48). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis reveals that DC is associated with higher mortality and poorer neurological outcomes in ASDH compared to CO. Notably, this difference in outcomes might be driven by baseline patient severity, as the significance of surgical choice diminishes after adjusting for this factor. Our findings challenge previous opinions regarding the superiority of CO over DC and underscore the importance of considering patient-specific characteristics when making surgical decisions. This insight offers guidance for surgeons in making decisions tailored to the specific conditions of their patients.