1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09345.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Crude Methanolic CDS Extracts from Various Tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modified protocols for CDS preparations have resulted in the isolation of another ’clonidine‐displacing substance‘, for which it has not yet been definitely clarified whether it is different or identical to the substance described by Atlas ( Atlas & Burstein, 1984a , 1984b ; Atlas et al ., 1987 ). Spectroscopic studies and HPLC have shown that this isolated CDS is not noradrenaline, adrenaline, histamine, agmatine, guanosine, GMP, GDP or GDP, but that it represents a guanosine derivative ( Grigg et al ., 1998 ; Parker et al ., 1999a , 1999b ). Functional studies and binding data, however, remain to be performed.…”
Section: Comparison Between Cds and Agmatine Regarding Their Moleculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified protocols for CDS preparations have resulted in the isolation of another ’clonidine‐displacing substance‘, for which it has not yet been definitely clarified whether it is different or identical to the substance described by Atlas ( Atlas & Burstein, 1984a , 1984b ; Atlas et al ., 1987 ). Spectroscopic studies and HPLC have shown that this isolated CDS is not noradrenaline, adrenaline, histamine, agmatine, guanosine, GMP, GDP or GDP, but that it represents a guanosine derivative ( Grigg et al ., 1998 ; Parker et al ., 1999a , 1999b ). Functional studies and binding data, however, remain to be performed.…”
Section: Comparison Between Cds and Agmatine Regarding Their Moleculamentioning
confidence: 99%