2016
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.58049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Degree of Conversion and Microleakage in Bulkfill Flowable Composite and Conventional Flowable Composite(an in Vitro Study)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different sizes of the filler particles are another variable that could affect the DC of a resin composite. This is attributed to the scattering effect of tiny fillers which reduces the amount of light transmitted through the resin [18]. The commercially available (group 1) had a higher conversion rate than the other groups in this study, which could be due to unique filler combinations and different filler sizes in comparison to the other groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different sizes of the filler particles are another variable that could affect the DC of a resin composite. This is attributed to the scattering effect of tiny fillers which reduces the amount of light transmitted through the resin [18]. The commercially available (group 1) had a higher conversion rate than the other groups in this study, which could be due to unique filler combinations and different filler sizes in comparison to the other groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Based on these considerations the FTIR was the method of choice in this study as it is the simplest and most reliable technique [17]. FTIR detects the amount of unreacted C = C in the resin matrix and C = C stretching vibrations directly before and after curing of resin composite to determine changes in mechanical performance [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous authors compared microleakage of flowable bulk-fill composite resins with that of conventional composite resins and reported less microleakage with the use of flowable bulk-fill composite resins, which was attributed to higher degree of conversion of flowable bulk-fill composite resins compared to conventional composite resins [24]. In addition, two separate studies showed proper performance of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill composite resin in relation to microleakage [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%