2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2009.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dental practice income and expenses according to treatment types in the Japanese insurance system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients must pay 30% of dental care costs, but that co-payment is reduced to 10% for people 70 years or older [ 22 ]. Non-insured dental treatments, such as implants, are paid in full by patients [ 23 ]. Without insurance coverage, the average cost for a single implant in Japan ranges from 3000 to 6000 United States Dollars (USD), along with an annual maintenance fee between 30 and 100 USD [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients must pay 30% of dental care costs, but that co-payment is reduced to 10% for people 70 years or older [ 22 ]. Non-insured dental treatments, such as implants, are paid in full by patients [ 23 ]. Without insurance coverage, the average cost for a single implant in Japan ranges from 3000 to 6000 United States Dollars (USD), along with an annual maintenance fee between 30 and 100 USD [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a larger study, segmentation of data by geographic region or dental practice type could inform the development of more targeted access programmes. 21 Furthermore, combining subjective and clinical oral health outcomes as well as behavioural measures (all of which are collected as part of the OHO data collection tool) can be helpful in identifying treatment needs for population groups and targeting services accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%