1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1985.tb01904.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dental prophylaxis and toothbrushing prior to topical APF applications

Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dental prophylaxis prior to the topical application of acidulated phosphate fluoride solution applied twice a year in schoolchildren. Experimental groups were: Group I--control group, had no treatment. Group II--twice yearly topical application of acidulated phosphate fluoride solution with prior professional prophylaxis with rubber cup and non fluoride paste. Group III--twice yearly topical application of acidulated phosphate fluoride solution with prior toot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These children were followed up for three years in the former and for two years in the latter study. The results of both studies revealed no statistically signifi cant differences in DMFS/DMFT increments between a PATF with or without a prior prophylaxis (grade of recommendation D/E; see Table 2) Bijella et al 23 undertook a longitudinal clinical study (level II-1) to evaluate the effect of dental prophylaxis before the topical application of acidulated phosphate fl uoride solution applied twice a year in 160 schoolchildren aged 7-10 yrs. These children were divided into three groups: Group I: control group, had no treatment; Club were conducted.…”
Section: Dental Prophylaxis and Caries Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These children were followed up for three years in the former and for two years in the latter study. The results of both studies revealed no statistically signifi cant differences in DMFS/DMFT increments between a PATF with or without a prior prophylaxis (grade of recommendation D/E; see Table 2) Bijella et al 23 undertook a longitudinal clinical study (level II-1) to evaluate the effect of dental prophylaxis before the topical application of acidulated phosphate fl uoride solution applied twice a year in 160 schoolchildren aged 7-10 yrs. These children were divided into three groups: Group I: control group, had no treatment; Club were conducted.…”
Section: Dental Prophylaxis and Caries Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Johnston and Lewis 24 performed a randomised, three-year, community-based clinical trial of professionally applied APF gel involving the use and non-use of a prior dental prophylaxis and annual and biannual APF applications for highrisk children in age groups 6-7 (n = 176) and 10-11 (n = 153) years initially. Their fi ndings were consistent with all of the above studies; neither the provision of prior prophylaxis (as compared with non-use of a prior dental prophylaxis) nor bi-annual PATF resulted in statistically significant three-year reduction in mean caries increments (grade of recommendation: D).…”
Section: Levels Of Evidence -Research Design Ratingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four independent clinical trials Houpt et al, 1983;Katzet al, 1984;Bijella et al, 1985] where APFgels were applied with or without prior cleaning, have failed to show a signif icant difference between the groups (table 5).…”
Section: Professionally Applied Topical Fluoride Gelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para conhecer os resultados preventivos do método, desenvolveu-se o presente estudo, que prosseguiu durante um ano com as aplicações tópicas de flúor com a mesma metodologia inicial estabelecida pelo PREGAD (Programa Nacional de Prevenção da Cárie Dental) 12 . Até então largamente utilizado em consultórios particulares, o Gel FFA ganhou viabilidade em saúde pública com a criação de uma nova metodologia de aplicação para grupos numerosos de pessoas e com a eliminação da necessidade de profilaxia prévia 1,6,7,14,20,21 . Vários trabalhos científicos asseguram a eficácia das aplicações tópicas de Gel FFA, principalmente em áreas sem fluoretação da água 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,11,18,20,21,24 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Até então largamente utilizado em consultórios particulares, o Gel FFA ganhou viabilidade em saúde pública com a criação de uma nova metodologia de aplicação para grupos numerosos de pessoas e com a eliminação da necessidade de profilaxia prévia 1,6,7,14,20,21 . Vários trabalhos científicos asseguram a eficácia das aplicações tópicas de Gel FFA, principalmente em áreas sem fluoretação da água 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,11,18,20,21,24 . Com base nos estudos disponíveis, estima-se que o método possibilita uma redução na ocorrên-cia de novas superfícies cariadas entre 23% e 33% 5,18,19 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified