2023
DOI: 10.3390/ma17010168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Dental Zirconium Oxide Ceramics Produced Using Additive and Removal Technology for Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry—Strength and Surface Tests: An In Vitro Study

Wojciech Frąckiewicz,
Marcin Królikowski,
Konrad Kwiatkowski
et al.

Abstract: Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the mechanical and functional properties of zirconium oxide ceramics made using 3D printing technology and ceramics produced using conventional dental milling machines. Methods: Forty zirconia samples were prepared for this study: the control group consisted of 20 samples made using milling technology, and the test group consisted of 20 samples made using 3D printing technology. Their surface parameters were measured, and then their mechanical paramet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05. The power analysis was based on previous research with a comparable study design to detect differences between zirconia-based specimens [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05. The power analysis was based on previous research with a comparable study design to detect differences between zirconia-based specimens [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before microbiological tests, surface measurements were performed on zirconium oxide samples to examine the roughness of its surface [ 21 ]. To make them, 20 bars with dimensions of 30 × 5 × 4 mm were used in two technologies, 10 for subtractive technology (SM group) and additive technology (AM group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%