1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-980x(98)00038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in conscious humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
286
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 424 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
12
286
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…respectively (Di Lazzaro et al, 1998). D-waves have a shorter latency then I-waves and are produced when the cortical neurones are activated directly, within a few millimetres of the cell body.…”
Section: 2: Techniques Used To Assess Corticospinal Excitabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…respectively (Di Lazzaro et al, 1998). D-waves have a shorter latency then I-waves and are produced when the cortical neurones are activated directly, within a few millimetres of the cell body.…”
Section: 2: Techniques Used To Assess Corticospinal Excitabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At active motor threshold, defined as the minimum stimulus intensity that produces a MEP, 50% of the time during isometric contractions of a tested muscle at a pre-determined contraction intensity, TMS has been found to produce I-waves only. As the stimulator level is increased, the magnetic impulse begins to activate the cortical neurones directly (Di Lazzaro et al 1998). These D-waves and I-waves all induce postsynaptic potentials which summate at the motoneurone (Palmer & Ashby, 1992).…”
Section: 2: Techniques Used To Assess Corticospinal Excitabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coil was held tangentially to the skull over the left primary motor cortex (M1) with the handle pointing posterolaterally at a 451 angle to the sagittal plane. This orientation of the induced electrical field is thought to be optimal for a predominantly transsynaptic mode of activation of the corticospinal system (Di Lazzaro et al, 1998). At the beginning of each session, the optimal position of the TMS coil over the left M1 for eliciting MEP in the resting hand muscle was assessed.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, TMS is the only technique that allows one to evaluate the corticospinal pathway functionality in the intact human, from the cortex to the target muscles of the contralateral hemibody [1], and is widely used both in motor control research and in patients with neurological disorders ( [36,37] for recent reviews). The technique is based on a brief magnetic pulse which is delivered to the scalp through a coil, and currents induced in the brain may produce excitation or inhibition of superficial cortical neurons [21]: for example, single-pulse TMS applied on the scalp overlying M1 elicits contralateral muscle twitches (called motor evoked potentials, or MEPs), that reflect physiological properties of the corticospinal drive during voluntary [31,13,44] or even imagined [40] motor commands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%