2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2023.101767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and ketamine in adjuvant with morphine for postoperative pain management following lumbar fusion surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reviewer thoroughly assessed the methodological quality and risk of bias of the 15 included studies [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] using a modified ROBVIS tool (Figure 2). Overall, the studies were well conducted, with low risk of bias ratings across most domains.…”
Section: The Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reviewer thoroughly assessed the methodological quality and risk of bias of the 15 included studies [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] using a modified ROBVIS tool (Figure 2). Overall, the studies were well conducted, with low risk of bias ratings across most domains.…”
Section: The Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome assessors were blinded in all the randomized trials, overcoming detection bias. Attrition and reporting bias were minimal, as most studies had complete outcome data and fully reported their pre-specified outcomes [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. Overall judgments took these minor uncertainties into account, but the studies were still considered to have a reasonably low risk of bias.…”
Section: The Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%