1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9975(96)80034-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of diagnostic methods for detecting gastric Helicobacter-like organisms in dogs and cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
28
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the results of culture and biopsies taken from infected cats at 3.5, 8, and 12 months are combined, it is apparent that culture was positive for H. felis at 3 of 15 sampling points, PCR was positive for H. felis at 9 of 10 sampling points, modified Steiner staining was positive for HLOs at 15 of 15 sampling points, and urease tests were positive at 13 of 15 sampling points. These observations concur with studies with H. felis-infected mice and dogs with naturally acquired helicobacteriosis, in which microscopy was more sensitive than culture and urease (31,45). Our observation that PCR was sensitive and specific is in agreement with studies of mice and dogs infected with H. felis and humans and cats infected with H. pylori (18,35,56,63).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…When the results of culture and biopsies taken from infected cats at 3.5, 8, and 12 months are combined, it is apparent that culture was positive for H. felis at 3 of 15 sampling points, PCR was positive for H. felis at 9 of 10 sampling points, modified Steiner staining was positive for HLOs at 15 of 15 sampling points, and urease tests were positive at 13 of 15 sampling points. These observations concur with studies with H. felis-infected mice and dogs with naturally acquired helicobacteriosis, in which microscopy was more sensitive than culture and urease (31,45). Our observation that PCR was sensitive and specific is in agreement with studies of mice and dogs infected with H. felis and humans and cats infected with H. pylori (18,35,56,63).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…are frequently found in dogs [6][7][8]15 , not only in healthy animals 15 , but also in dogs with gastropathy simptoms 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gastric Helicobacter commonly found in dogs are Helicobacter bizzozeroni, Helicobacter felis, Helicobacter heilmannii and Helicobacter salomonis 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each histological sample, 10 microscopic visual fields were evaluated for helicobacteria amount at the superficial epithelium, in gastric pits, and deeper into the mucosa at glandulocytes (Happonen et al, 1996; Hermanns, Kregel, Breuer, & Lechner, 1995; Vorobjova, Hurlimann, Zimmermann, Uibo, & Halter, 2005). In each mucosa histological sample of the fundic gland region, the amount of helicobacteria was arranged into four groups (Happonen et al, 1998): no helicobacteria in one visual field -absent; 1-10 helicobacteria in one visual field -mild; 10-50 helicobacteria in one visual field -moderate; and more than 50 helicobacteria in one microscopic visual field -severe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%