1994
DOI: 10.2307/1564624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Dietary Overlap between Allopatric and Sympatric Geckos

Abstract: ABSTRAC~.-Two gecko species, Hemidactylus turcicus and Cyrtopodion scabrum, have been introduced into the Port of Galveston, Texas. While H. turcicus has been established for a longer period of time, the-relatively recent introduction of C.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, today several other, more recently introduced, gekkonid species compete with H. turcicus in some regions. For instance, at Port Galveston, Texas, H. turcicus has apparently been replaced by the recently introduced lizard Cyrtopodion scabrum (Klawinski et al. , 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, today several other, more recently introduced, gekkonid species compete with H. turcicus in some regions. For instance, at Port Galveston, Texas, H. turcicus has apparently been replaced by the recently introduced lizard Cyrtopodion scabrum (Klawinski et al. , 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) finding natural situations where both competitors exist in isolation from one another; or (3) by increasing resource availability so that competition is removed (Klawinski et al 1994). Investigating the second option was a possibility, but the invertebrate fauna and habitat structure were markedly different on Ile aux Aigrettes compared to islands where the two geckos existed in isolation from one another (Cole 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies did not report prey volume data in a way I could re‐analyse, perhaps because prey volume is often considered less important than number of prey items (Magnusson et al 2003) or because some lizard species finely chew and fragment prey prior to swallowing, thus impeding reliable measurements of volume (Klawinski et al 1994). In some instances (Mesquita et al 2006), original sources reported a dietary importance index, or an average value between prey item number and prey volume, but did not report actual numbers or volume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%