2017
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000009365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different automated lesion delineation methods for metabolic tumor volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To limit multiple comparisons and because the optimal threshold in patients with earlier (stage i) disease is not known, we used a gradient method for mtv delineation. In one study of patients with stage i adenocarcinoma of the lung, a gradient methods of mtv delineation was shown to have the highest accuracy in high-uptake large solid nodules, but a threshold method was best for low-uptake small nonsolid nodules 31 . In patients with head-and-neck tumours, use of threshold or gradient methods to delineate mtv did not significantly influence the prognostic value of that variable 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To limit multiple comparisons and because the optimal threshold in patients with earlier (stage i) disease is not known, we used a gradient method for mtv delineation. In one study of patients with stage i adenocarcinoma of the lung, a gradient methods of mtv delineation was shown to have the highest accuracy in high-uptake large solid nodules, but a threshold method was best for low-uptake small nonsolid nodules 31 . In patients with head-and-neck tumours, use of threshold or gradient methods to delineate mtv did not significantly influence the prognostic value of that variable 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It indicates that BPL algorithm can make the measurement less affected by the segmentation method. With the non-BPL reconstruction method, PET/CT quantitative studies on cervical cancer and lung cancer lesions have con rmed that the iterative adaptive method can improve the MTV measurement accuracy [10,11]. The iterative adaptive method is to get the optimal threshold value by weighting SUV max and SUV mean in the targeted lesion [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the method using for MTV delineation also needs to be careful and precise. At present, most studies use a xed SUV threshold (such as SUV ≥ 2.5 or SUV ≥ 4.0) or a percentage of SUV max (such as 42% SUV max ) to de ne MTV [8][9][10]. Meanwhile, Xu et al also proposed that using the iterative adaptive method of PET VCAR software (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee) was more accurate than using the SUV max percentage threshold method to determine MTVs [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21]. Currently, various automated methods are used to quantitatively estimate FDG uptake: fixed SUV threshold (e.g., SUV2.50), percentage threshold of SUVmax, gradient-based threshold, and background-related threshold [37]. New volumetric quantification methods such as: percentage of lung volume with increased metabolic activity (“%SUV-high”) and average metabolic activity in the lung (“SUVmean”) could be helpful for evaluating small lung changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%