2018
DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2018.1541437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different body measurement techniques: 3D stationary scanner, 3D handheld scanner, and tape measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum difference observed was 0.78 mm for the handheld 3D Scanner, below the 1 mm resolution defined by the NIJ 0101.04 [ 3 ] standard, allowing the application of both techniques in the measurement process considered. Xia et al [ 28 ] obtained very similar results when comparing a handheld scanner and a static scanner. Although the results were for the comparison between the two scanners, it is possible to establish common points between the present work and the one presented by Xia et al In both works, the best results were obtained by static acquisition techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum difference observed was 0.78 mm for the handheld 3D Scanner, below the 1 mm resolution defined by the NIJ 0101.04 [ 3 ] standard, allowing the application of both techniques in the measurement process considered. Xia et al [ 28 ] obtained very similar results when comparing a handheld scanner and a static scanner. Although the results were for the comparison between the two scanners, it is possible to establish common points between the present work and the one presented by Xia et al In both works, the best results were obtained by static acquisition techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In particular, applicability studies for 3D scanners and their comparison with conventional methods were developed by Asís et al [ 27 ] with solar panels applications. Additionally, Xia et al [ 28 ] made the comparison between conventional techniques and two different types of scanners, aiming at application in the textile area, while National Research Council Of The National Academies [ 5 ] studied it in the scope of the measurement of trauma depths in ballistic vest tests. The latter study was of high relevance for the area, since it served as the basis for several subsequent studies on the entire ballistic vest conformity assessment process [ 5 ].…”
Section: Review Of Surface 3d Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the single scans, obtained by different viewpoints, must be aligned in a common reference system to gather the overall patient’s anatomy. Stationary scanners are characterized by good performances in terms of accuracy and reliability [ 2 ]. However, their use is limited by the high costs and the need for skilled technicians to acquire anatomical data.…”
Section: 3d Scanner Architectures For the Reconstruction Of Upper mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the human anatomy field, for example, body measurements are used to record the evolution of the population [ 1 ]. In the apparel industry, body measurements are used to improve body fitting of garments [ 2 , 3 ], while ergonomics adopt measurements to enhance human interaction with the product [ 4 ]. In the field of patient rehabilitation, 3D body scanning is considered a crucial starting point for subsequent 3D model design and fabrication of bespoke devices, especially when additive manufacturing techniques are involved in their production [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frente a las tecnologías existentes para la medición del cuerpo humano, Xia et al (2018) presentan un comparativo de tres diferentes tecnologías: cinta métrica, escáner 3D comercial estacionario, y escáner de mano. Entre los resultados se encuentra que el escáner estacionario tiene un mejor desempeño, frente al escáner de mano.…”
Section: Industria 40unclassified