1988
DOI: 10.1049/ip-a-1.1988.0078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different boundary integral formulations when coupled with finite elements in three dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
6

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Concern about this problem has already been expressed [5,19,. Excessive such concern may be uncalled for, as theoretical results [28] as well as numerical experiments [29] show that this loss of symmetry may not be that critical. However, symmetry is still highly desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concern about this problem has already been expressed [5,19,. Excessive such concern may be uncalled for, as theoretical results [28] as well as numerical experiments [29] show that this loss of symmetry may not be that critical. However, symmetry is still highly desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…But it is not so; the part of the matrix coming from the boundary stiffness is not symmetric, if one follows a straightforward approach to its discretization. Concern about this problem has already been expressed [5,19,25-271. Excessive such concern may be uncalled for, as theoretical results [28] as well as numerical experiments [29] show that this loss of symmetry may not be that critical. However, symmetry is still highly desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid methods which solve the Poisson equation for the interior magnetostatic domains and the boundary integral form of the potential equation for the exterior magnetostatic domain have also been developed [11,12]. These hybrid methods can accurately take into account the unbounded regions with the boundary integral formulation and at the same time can treat nonlinearities such as saturation, non-isotropism or eddy currents in the magnetic materials [13]. Besides, only the interior domains and their boundaries need to be discretized in this case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans une telle situation il semble naturel d'associer aux éléments finis une autre technique de calcul afin d'effectuer une modélisation fidèle d'un dispositif avec un coût raisonnable. C'est un choix souvent judicieux dans le cas bidimensionnel [3][4][5][6]11] mais qui devient alors crucial en trois dimensions [1,7]. Nous effectuons dans ce qui suit deux types de couplage dans le cadre d'une géométrie axisymétri-Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/rphysap:0198900240110104900 que : 1) une combinaison éléments finis/éléments de frontière ; 2) une combinaison éléments finis/développement analytique.…”
unclassified