2021
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1940109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different estimation methods for extreme value distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this example, the final choice of the Bayesian approach to estimate the GPD model parameters is confirmed in the bottom right panel of Figure 9 which highlights both the best model fit to the top 10 extreme values recorded and satisfactory error estimates. The improved result using the Bayesian estimation method accords with the findings of Yilmaz et al ( 2021) [46].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Testing For Evasupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this example, the final choice of the Bayesian approach to estimate the GPD model parameters is confirmed in the bottom right panel of Figure 9 which highlights both the best model fit to the top 10 extreme values recorded and satisfactory error estimates. The improved result using the Bayesian estimation method accords with the findings of Yilmaz et al ( 2021) [46].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Testing For Evasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…All the aforementioned factors are most likely to increase in intensity with climate change [46]. Although this study finds no statistical evidence (yet) of an increase in extreme water levels over time (refer to Section 4.1), it is likely that a small positive trend will emerge should the prevalence of extreme events measured over the past two decades continue over the forthcoming decade.…”
Section: The Shape Of the Eva Return Level Plotmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hosking (1990) compared the MoM against L‐Moments for samples of precipitation data in California and concluded that L‐moments outperforms the former. Later a similar comparison (Yılmaza et al., 2021) of ML and moment method against different types of L‐moment methods, best linear estimators (BLUE) and purely Bayesian MCMC methods, corroborates that L‐moments and Bayesian methods outperform the others in most cases. An additional benefit of the PWMs is the convenient way of statistical testing of the parameters for samples of size n by taking the case κ = 0 (i.e., data are asymptotically N (0, 0.5635/ n ) as the zero‐hypothesis, which must otherwise be rejected).…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 62%